City of Mill Creek
Taking a New Look at the East Gateway Urban Village

The Advisory Committee was comprised of developers, architects, retailers, real estate market

experts and brokers to provide candid insights and feedback on ways to enhance the EGUV

appeal in today’s competitive market.  The Advisory Committee met on October 12, 2010. 

The results of the Advisory Committee meeting are summarized below.

 

Advisory Committee Suggested Changes to the EGUV Illustrative Plan:

·        Create a bold plan.  Must be different than Town Center, long term sustainability, different

        than other centers in the vicinity

·        Define what the City will do to participate

·        Make sure the development creates a “There” there

·        Rethink some of the zoning restrictions to make the site competitive

·        Infrastructure to create momentum – public plazas, public park, and wetland viewing platform

·        Consider larger format user (100,000 sq ft+), if designed consistent with vision

·        Consider reducing retail square footage

·        Consider movie theatre, community facilities and senior housing

  

Options A and B

In order to convey the vision of the suggested revisions to the EGUV Illustrative Plan to the public, the City worked with Callison Architecture to prepare two potential refinements to the EGUV Illustrative Master Plan: Option A, which incorporates a big box store, and Option B, which has no big box store and maintains the code-required 60,000 square foot maximum building footprint.  Below is a brief description/comparison of the two options:

 

Both options share many site development characteristics consistent with the EGUV policies.  The location of the site access points and the general alignment of the Spine Road are consistent with the EGUV Preliminary Engineering Design Study, which features controlled intersections at 39th Avenue SE and 44th Avenue SE and the right-in/right-out access across from the elementary school. There is also access off Seattle Hill Road at 136th Street SE utilizing a roundabout. 

 

Both options introduce a medium size anchor (50,000 sq. ft.) on the west end of the site adjacent to the 39th Avenue SE entry.  This anchor could be a cinema, or some other type of large retailer such as a grocer. Each of the buildings along the southern side of the Spine Road would have up to 4 stories of residential units above one story of retail use.  There is a landscaped parking area, which would create a natural buffer between the single-family neighborhood to the south and new structures that could be constructed over one of the two regional detention vaults.  The northern side of the main street is set up for single story structures with retail and food and beverage uses.  Both options incorporate a 40,000 square foot civic use in the development.  The civic use could be a library or a community center.

 

Both options also include three large landscaped plaza areas along the spine road, with the largest (approximately 15,000 square feet) located adjacent to the medium sized anchor.  This plaza would be large enough to host a variety of events like an art show, farmers market, etc.  A second plaza area is shown adjacent to the potential civic use area. A third plaza area is shown at the intersection of the spine road and 44th Avenue SE.  Within the wetland buffer on the west side of the project site, open space and trails are shown.  The trails connect to a pedestrian trail that runs along the southern boundary for the full length of the site.  Both sides of the main street are lined with wide sidewalks and short term on-street parking.  This sidewalk and parking will help to provide an active, vibrant street.  Longer term parking is provided in a series of on grade landscaped parking areas in the rear of most structures.  A new public neighborhood park with adjacent multifamily residential structures is located in the southeast portion of the development site adjacent to the concentrated residential developments and near the pedestrian access to the existing single-family neighborhoods.

 

Option A:  The main feature of the Option A alternative is that a big box store (130,000 square feet) is shown on the eastern portion of the site.  A large parking lot is shown in front of the large retail anchor.  Option A places the 40,000 square foot “civic” building on the south side of the spine road adjacent to retail or food and beverage services and one of the public plazas.  Other differences are that there is more commercial space and fewer residential units in Option A compared to Option B.  Option A has a total of 351,500 square feet of retail/commercial use, a 40,000 square foot civic building, 13,927 square feet of church use, and 394 residential units.

 

Option B:  The main feature of the Option B alternative is the lack of the big box store, with the alternative instead having the mixed use element of the project integrated throughout the site for vibrant and active ground level activity and a greater emphasis on residential use.  In place of the big box on the eastern potion of the site, buildings with retail uses on the ground floor, with office and residential uses above, line the internal drive aisles and streets and a fourth landscaped public plaza. Also unique to Option B, the 40,000 square foot “civic” building is situated on the north side of the spine road.  Option B has a total of 292,500 square feet of retail/commercial use (59,000 square feet less than Option A), a 40,000 square foot civic building, 13,927 square feet of church use, and up to 694 residential units (300 more residential units than Option A).

 

Both options are generally consistent with the policies within the EGUV Comprehensive Plan policies.  Option A, however, would require an amendment to the provision of the Development Code that restricts the footprint of a single occupant building in the EGUV to 60,000 square feet.  Please click here to view both Options A and B; send comments to Christi@cityofmillcreek.com

 

Community Input on Options A and B

On April 5, 2011, the City staff presented to the Council the potential revisions as suggested by the Advisory Committee to the EGPUV as shown in Options A and B.  The Council reviewed the Advisory Committee suggestions and recommended that Staff present the Options to the property owners with the EGUV and then solicit public comment on Options A and B.  

 

June 21, 2011 Open House on Options A and B

On June 21, 2011, the City held an open house to solicit public comment on Options A and B.  Approximately 50 people attended the open house.  You may still submit your comments and suggestions regarding the ideas and concepts contained in Options A and B to Christi@cityofmillcreek.com.

 

Next Steps for the EGUV

The City will continue to solicit comments on the Options through the public participation process; more news to come…

 

Changes to the Illustrative Plan/Comprehensive Plan amendments will likely be considered as a part of the 2012 annual Comprehensive Plan update process or separately as a subarea plan.

 

City Contacts

Should you have any questions regarding the City’s progress on the development of the East Gateway Urban Village, you can contact Christi Amrine, Senior Planner at christi@cityofmillcreek.com or Scott Smith, City Engineer at scott@cityofmillcreek.com or by phone at 425-745-1891.

 



 

Addressing the Economic Downturn in Development
Since the adoption of the East Gateway Urban Village (EGUV) in 2008, the City has received many inquiries about development; however, only one development application has been submitted for a 24, 000 square foot office/medial building at 4224 132nd Street SE.  Thus, in an effort to attract development interest to the EGUV, in the fall of 2010, the City assembled an “Advisory Committee.” 

  Department of
     Community
         Development
Links to:

Design Guidelines

Illustrative Master Plan

Preliminary Engineering Study

Proposed Revisions

Fiscal Impact Analysis
  
Home